The finance sector in India has been revolutionized by financial technologies with prominent FinTech participants such as PhonePe, Paytm, PolicyBazaar, Razorpay, Paypal, Zerodha, etc. The rapid expansion of these FinTech companies and widespread acceptance by a large population raises serious concerns relating to various aspects including but not limited to customer protection, data privacy, cyber security, grievance handling, etc. In an attempt to minimise these risks and pave way for a regulated FinTech sector, the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) vide its notification dated May 30, 2024 published the Framework for Self-Regulatory Organisation(s) in the FinTech Sector (“Framework”). The key highlights of this Framework are covered below.
Background
Key definitions
Eligibility and Membership Requirements for an applicant FinTech Self-Regulatory Organisation(s) (“SRO-FT”)
A. General Eligibility requirements: In order to be established as an SRO-FT, the applicant shall fulfil the following general requirements:
B. Membership Criteria: In addition to the general requirements, the applicant must meet the following membership criteria as well.
C. Fit and proper criteria for Board of Directors (“BoD”) and Key Managerial Personnels (“KMPs”): The Framework prescribes the following conditions to be fulfilled by the BoDs and KMPs of the applicant SRO-FT:
D. Application Requirements: Once the above criteria are met, the applicant may proceed to submission of the application to RBI. The following are the key points to be noted:
i. Supporting documents required: Application must be accompanied by:
ii. Submission of Application to RBI: Application may be submitted under the authorisation of the Board, by any representative organisation, i.e., any FT organization who is a member of the SRO-FT or who have explicitly conveyed its intention to be a member in the future.
E. Processing the Applications: Where applicant is suitable, RBI issues a “Letter of Recognition” to the SRO-FT. RBI also reserves the right not to grant recognition to any SRO-FT. In case of incomplete applications or applications not meeting the eligibility criteria would be returned/rejected. However, prior to returning/rejecting, RBI would provide the applicant with an opportunity of being heard.
Conclusion
The RBI Framework introduces the concept of self-governance of the FT industry and is a significant step towards bridging the gap between regulator and the FT industry. It is anticipated that this culture of self-governance would be able to address the present challenges effectively and aid in a robust environment that maximises the potential of FTs.
Please find a copy of the Framework, here.
This update has been contributed by Jitendra Soni (Partner) and Abhirami Retheev (Associate).
Argus Knowledge Centre is now on WhatsApp! Send us a message on +91 8433523504 to receive updates from our Knowledge Centre.
7A, 7th Floor, Tower C, Max House,
Okhla Industrial Area, Phase 3,
New Delhi – 110020
The rules of the Bar Council of India do not permit advocates to solicit work or advertise in any manner. This website has been created only for informational purposes and is not intended to constitute solicitation, invitation, advertisement or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work in any manner. By clicking on 'Agree' below, you acknowledge and confirm the following:
a) there has been no solicitation, invitation, advertisement or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;
b) you are desirous of obtaining further information about us on your own accord and for your use;
c) no information or material provided on this website is to be construed as a legal opinion and use of this website will not create any lawyer-client relationship;
d) while reasonable care has been taken in ensuring the accuracy of the contents of the website, Argus Partners shall not be responsible for the results of any actions taken on the basis of information provided in this website or for any error or omission in the website; and
e) in cases where the user has any legal issues, the user must seek independent legal advice.