In the case of ACRE – 81 Trust Through its trustee Assets Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Limited v. Pawan Kumar Goyal [2024 SCC OnLine NCLAT 90], the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (“Hon’ble NCLAT”) has affirmed the authority of the committee of creditors (“COC”) to opt for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor prior to approval of the resolution plan in accordance with section 33 (2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”).
Facts:
By an order dated March 5, 2021 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) was initiated against SARE Realty Projects Private Limited (“Corporate Debtor”). Subsequently, the IRP made a public announcement on March 9, 2021 to invite claims from the creditors of the Corporate Debtor.
During the 1st meeting of the COC, the IRP informed the COC that the office of the Corporate Debtor was closed for more than one year, all of the directors of the Corporate Debtor had resigned prior to the commencement of CIRP, the last audited financial statements filed by the Corporate Debtor were for the year ending March 31, 2017 and that the secured financial creditors had initiated enforcement proceedings under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,2002 (“SARFESI Act”) and taken possession of the project assets. After hearing this, two of the COC members, Indian Real Estate 2021 Trust and ACRE-81 Trust (“Appellants”) proposed the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.
Subsequently, in the other COC meetings, more particularly in the 4th COC meeting, the COC members had a detailed discussion on the issue of liquidation which included the powers of the COC to recommend liquidation of the Corporate Debtor at any time prior to approval of the resolution plan in accordance with Section 33 of the Code. However, the voting on the issue of liquidation was deferred to a later date. Thereafter, the COC with a majority of 88.48 % voted in favour of the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.
Accordingly, the IRP filed an application for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor before the Hon’ble NCLT (“Adjudicating Authority”). The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application filed by the IRP by its order dated March 16, 2021 (“Impugned Order”) and had inter alia observed the following:
Aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the Appellants had preferred this Appeal.
Heavily relying on the case of Sunil.S.Kakkad v. Atrium Infocom Private Limited, [2020 SCC OnLine NCLAT 1160], the Appellants contended that as per section 33 (2) of the Code, the Resolution Professional, at any time during the CIRP but before the confirmation of the resolution plan can intimate the Adjudicating Authority of the decision of the COC ( approved by not less than 66% of the voting share) to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. It was further contended that the COC may take a decision to liquidate the Corporate Debtor any time after its constitution prior to the confirmation of the resolution plan.
Decision by the Hon’ble NCLAT:
Allowing the Appeal, the Hon’ble NCLAT found merit in the contentions of the Appellants that the COC had the power to order liquidation of the Corporate Debtor prior to the confirmation of the Resolution Plan and that the penalty under Section 65 of the Code would not be applicable to the Appellants.
The Hon’ble NCLAT observed that the decision of Sunil.S.Kakkad v. Atrium Infocom Pvt. Ltd which was relied upon by the Appellants was upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Courtin its order dated January 7, 2021.
The Hon’ble NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority had not given any reasoning for forming an opinion much less prima facie that it was a case of malicious intent on the part of the IRP for filing the application for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.
The Tribunal passed an order allowing the Appeal and setting aside the Impugned Order.
Please find attached a copy of the order.
This update has been contributed by Ranjit Shetty (Senior Partner) and Arjun Amin (Associate).
Argus Knowledge Centre is now on WhatsApp! Send us a message on +91 8433523504 to receive updates from our Knowledge Centre.
Download Pdf
7A, 7th Floor, Tower C, Max House,
Okhla Industrial Area, Phase 3,
New Delhi – 110020
The rules of the Bar Council of India do not permit advocates to solicit work or advertise in any manner. This website has been created only for informational purposes and is not intended to constitute solicitation, invitation, advertisement or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work in any manner. By clicking on 'Agree' below, you acknowledge and confirm the following:
a) there has been no solicitation, invitation, advertisement or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;
b) you are desirous of obtaining further information about us on your own accord and for your use;
c) no information or material provided on this website is to be construed as a legal opinion and use of this website will not create any lawyer-client relationship;
d) while reasonable care has been taken in ensuring the accuracy of the contents of the website, Argus Partners shall not be responsible for the results of any actions taken on the basis of information provided in this website or for any error or omission in the website; and
e) in cases where the user has any legal issues, the user must seek independent legal advice.